Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Franklin Roosevelt and the Holocaust

In "The Conquerors" by Michael Beschloss, the author struggles to find explanations for some of Roosevelt's behaviors. For example, Roosevelt's silence about the holocaust during the war. " Franklin Roosevelt began receiving information as early as 1942 that Adolf Hitler, under a veil of secrecy, was carrying out his threats to" annihilate the Jewish race." One might expect the President to have gone on the radio and told Americans in stirring language exactly what his government was learning about the Nazi death camps, adding that this unimaginable crime was exactly what the Allies were fighting to banish from the world.

But Roosevelt made no such speech. Nor did he command the American propaganda organs to publicize everything the government knew about the extermination of the Jews. Instead, through at least the early months of 1944, the President's references to the subject were vague and seldom."

" In July 1942, the president of the American Jewish Congress, Rabbi Stephen Wise, asked the President for a statement that could be read to a Madison Square Garden rally against Hitler's oppression of Jews. -- But the president did not mention extermination or Jewish victims. Instead his statement said that Americans "sympathize with all victims of Nazi crime' and would hold the perpetrators "to strict accountability in a day of reckoning which will surely come."

In December 1942, Wise asked Roosevelt to tell the world about Hitler's war against the Jews and to try to stop it. The President replied that while his government knew many of the facts, it was hard to know what to do. Pressed for a statement, he advised Wise and the Jewish leaders to reissue the Madison Square Garden statement that he had issued in July. He insisted that that statement be quoted precisely.

In July 1943, at the White House, Lieutenant Jan Karski of the Polish underground army told Roosevelt about the mass murder of Jews that he had seen take place in a Polish concentration camp:"Our underground authorities are absolutely sure that the Germans are out to exterminate the entire Jewish population of Europe." The President listened intently but when Karski implored Roosevelt to intervene, the President replied, "Tell your nation that we shall win the war."

"As the historian Richard Breitman has written, Roosevelt's government "did not match Adolf Hitler's single-minded frenzy to wipe out the Jewish race with corresponding determination to save those Jews who could be saved."

"As Hitler's war against European Jewry raged on, Franklin Roosevelt maintained his silence. Before 1944, he avoided discussing the matter."

" By early June 1944, the Nazis had deported over 1/3 of Hungary's Jews in only three weeks, Jacob Rosenhein and other Jewish leaders wrote to American and British officials, imploring them to bomb the railway lines from Hungary to the death camp at Auschwitz in Poland." This was not done. Initially, Undersecretary McCloy's view was that diverting bombers and crews from bombing German industry and other strategic targets might have postponed VE day." Thanks to new information, however, we may conclude that the man who ultimately refused to bomb Auschwitz may not have been John McCloy but Franklin Roosevelt." Liddel Hart in his book "Strategy" stated that the war would probably have ended much sooner had the bombing targets not been shifted from millitary and industrial ones to civillian ones. We must ask ourselves why the bombing emphasis was shifted to civillian targets and why Roosevelt refused to bomb the concentration camps and the rail lines leading to them? To answer those questions, we must ask what the actual, not the stated war aims of the Allies were? The actual war aims of the Americans were stated succinctly by Eisenhower as he was about to cross the German border when he stated that his intent was to "kill as many Germans as he could." Michael Beschloss is too dimwitted and too infatuated with Roosevelt to look into actual American war aims.

During the war, most of the German men were in the armed forces and were not in danger of the American bombing of civilian neighborhoods. The primary inhabitants were women and children and these were the obvious targets because they were the future of Germany and Germany was to have no future. All the other Allies had become American client states who became dependent on Lend Lease. Even the Soviets had become a client state of the Americans because they still continued receiving Lend Lease aid into 1948, well after the beginning of the Cold War (as per James Bacque in Crimes and Mercies). Yes I know that Lend Lease formally ended in 1946 but commitments made under Lend Lease before it's formal termination were still made as late as 1948. The Soviets were the prime agents in the ethnic cleansing of eastern Europe's German population in which 18 million men, women and children were thrown out of their homes without food and shelter. Millions were murdered in the process, often with bestial cruelty that far exceeded the Nazis at their worst. As long as the Soviets continued this "good work", they were rewarded with Lend Lease. When Churchill balked at some of the American's demands, he was threatened with withdrawal of Lend Lease aid.

Now as to the reason that the Allies refused to bomb the concentration camps and the rail lines leading to them, I suspect that it was the result of a private agreement between Roosevelt and Stalin where Stalin asked Roosevelt not to interfere with the concentration camps because the removal of it's Jews would make Poland far more manageable after the war. Neither Roosevelt nor Stalin had any love for Jews. During the war, the safest place to be was probably along the railway lines leading to the concentration camps. Roosevelt was just another mass murderer alongside Hitler and Stalin. It is to Roosevelt and to the American Oligarchs whom he represented, that we can attribute responsibility for the murder of 12 to 14 million ethnic Germans during the period of 1945 through 1950. This figure is also from James Bacque's Crimes and Mercies. Bacque estimates that if the plans to fully implement the Morgenthau Plan had not been reversed, the death total among ethnic Germans after the war would have gone as high as 40 million. I would probably have been one of them. This mass murder of ethnic Germans is also part of the Holocaust but no one ever speaks about it.

Beschloss documents Roosevelt's hatred of anything German quite well. Roosevelt shrieked about how Germans were a race of militaristic beasts who had three times plunged the world into war. For the first time, he must have referred to the Franco-Prussian war. The French in that case had attacked Germany. The second time would have been WWI. I read with interest on the Web that the group of Serb assassins and their handlers (who assassinated Franz Ferdinand and his wife) met in Toulouse a month or so before the assassination. Why would they meet in Toulouse? I suspect that they were there to receive assurances of support from high level French and Russian officials that these countries would go to war if Austria-Hungary contested the outrage militarily. And that is precisely what happened. Primary responsibility for starting WWI lies with the French. And WWII? Britain had signed a treaty with Poland. However, there was an unpublished codicil to that treaty that Britain would go to war only if Poland was attacked by Germany, not by any other country. Thus, the fact that Poland was simultaneously attacked by the Soviet Union had no effect in triggering Britain's treaty obligations. Poland was there obviously only there  to draw Germany into war.

Beschloss mentions that Roosevelt entered into diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union in 1934 seeking allies against Germany. This seemed entirely natural to him. I guess he argued with himself that didn't the Nazis inaugurate the Holocaust? This would be true. However, the Nazis of 1934 were not the Nazis of 1942. In 1934 they were no worse than the vicious nationalists who governed Poland and Czechoslovakia who would come in their pants at the thought of driving out their German and Jewish minorities.The true monster mass murderers of 1934 were the Soviet communists. I suggest that there would have been no Holocaust had the Allies not rejected any offer at negotiating peace with Germany. It would be interesting to be able to read the notes of the Wannsee conference at which the Final Solution was decided on. I suspect that the idiot Nazis concluded that yet again the Jews were responsible for a war that they could increasingly see they could not win. After all, weren't there many Jews in Capitalist America and in Communist Russia?

Germany did send out Rudolph Hess to negotiate an end to hostilities with Britain. A very generous offer was made to Britain. Germany would pull out of France, the Low Countries and Denmark and Norway in return for a free hand against the Soviet Union. A very generous offer and one that I would think tempted Churchill severely. I suspect though that he may have received threats from Roosevelt that the US would take Canada and other British possessions into "protective custody" if he made peace with Germany. A fateful decision because Britain lost it's empire anyway as a result of a refusal to make peace. Britain was so weakened by the war that the empire slipped away.

Roosevelt met Stalin for the first time at the Tehran conference. Roosevelt was reportedly as jubilant as a schoolboy at meeting "Uncle Joe". Tehran was occupied by the Soviet Union and the compound in which they met was 100% under the control of the NKVD. The NKVD were the supreme poisoners of their day. On the first day there, Roosevelt became severely ill. His staff at first thought that he had been poisoned. Then they concluded that he had gotten a case of Grippe. However, he got steadily worse and a few months later, died. It seems highly probable to me that he was poisoned by Stalin. I think that the World owes Stalin a vote of thanks for getting rid of a fellow mass murderer

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

The comment/statement 'Polish concentration camp ' is incorrect and needs to be changed. The Nazi Germans established the 'concentration camps' on occupied Polish soil. The camps were not Polish as implied by the incorrect comment.

T Byro said...

Sorry. This is correct but I was quoting directly from the wording in the book

T Byro said...

Sorry. This is correct but I was quoting directly from the wording in the book

Matthew said...

This sentence seems hyperbolic:
"Millions were murdered in the process, often with bestial cruelty that far exceeded the Nazis at their worst."

What bestial cruelty exceeded starving families in subarctic labor camps while vivisecting some of them? Only Japanese forced cannibalism among Pacific islanders, as far as I know. Even American firebombing of urban neighborhoods doesn't seem quite as cruel, as it was far quicker and less intimate.

Matthew said...

"I suggest that there would have been no Holocaust had the Allies not rejected any offer at negotiating peace with Germany."

Several nations had imperial ambitions following WWI. Leaving aside the US and UK, the most ambitious imperialists were Japan, Germany and Russia. They agreed mutual nonagression in August/September 1939, and each immediately attacked territory under UK/French military protection (Poland, French Indochina). Successful, Japan joined with Italy to Germany and attacked the UK protected Malaysia.

The UK and US could have attacked a combined Germany/Italy/Russia/Japan (France was conquered by May 1940). Or it could have turned Russia against at least Germany, which it did (and finally Japan when the risk was minimized by the end of the war, and Italy was already flipped). Given the large casualties and killings in the Soviet war on Germany, compared to the margin of Allied victory in Europe, it seems likely the original Russian partnership would have defeated the (other) Allied powers. The Soviets evidently preferred the aftermath of joining the Allied defeat of the Axis to the aftermath further battling the Anti-Cominern powers surrounding it. But for the US, choosing to fight first the Axis with Russia on its side and later Russia seems reasonable even knowing what was known in 1939-1941. In retrospect it seems clearly the correct strategy. Rejecting any German peace let the US defeat all other imperial challengers one by one, including ginning up the decades of Cold War until the US decided to conquer the world with more directly economic means.

As for the Holocaust, Nazi policy prioritized exterminating Jews since the 1920s. Whether merely useful propaganda or whatever is a "sincere belief" among crazy assholes like the Nazis, extermination was going to go the distance in the bulk of Europe the Nazis occupied by 1942. As you indicated, Roosevelt wasn't going to spend any political capital preventing it in any peace talks, if Germans had come up with some acceptable to the US/UK. The Nazi empire was going to exterminate all the Jews within its reach (ie. all but the British and American ones), even if only as scapegoat for the destruction it wreaked on mainland Europe conquering it. And with a few years to reorganize Eurasian/Pacific production, the Nazis and the Japanese Empire would probably have divided up the Soviet Union, while the US and UK accepted that as a silver lining. And them inevitably turned against each other, the Nazis killing any remaining Jews within reach as more scapegoats. Or perhaps putting that off until after eliminating US/UK interference with the conquest of their colonies, turned into conquering the UK and US themselves.

In any case the Holocaust was in the cards. Not just the Jews, but the Gypsies, the Catholics, and the rest of Niemoller's litany. And, as you point out, the Germans generally throughout Europe, a counter-ethnocide that is appropriate to consider part of the Holocaust. Given the length, depth and quality of the racist propaganda on all sides that drove the populations to cooperate with conscription as much as they'd cooperated in electing each of the mass murderers leading the belligerents, and the benefits to those in power of the millions eliminated, I see no version of the 1940s in which there was no Holocaust.

T Byro said...

For inventive cruelties, you could hardly beat the Czechs but I will get into this in another posting. When a generator blew up, a mob was whipped up that threw 2500 women and children off a bridge to their deaths.Vaclav Havel had the decency of having a plaque erected to the murdered. In Prague, Germans were drenched in oil and hung from lamp posts and set ablaze. In another town, all the women and girls had their achilles tendons cut so they couldn't run away and were repeatedly raped and then killed. Tens of thousands of German soldiers were killed by being whipped and or clubbed to death

T Byro said...

Nothing is inevitable. The outcome we had with WWII is just the worst of all possible ones. In his book "Strategy" Liddel Hart says that the German General Staff had concluded that Germany could not win a war with the Soviet Union.A better strategy would have been to let the two lug it out and bleed to death together. And extermination was not the original plan of the Nazis. In the early 1930's, the SD was kidnapping Jews off the streets of Germany in cooperation with the Irgun and smuggling them into Palestine. Mass murder of Jews was only possible secretly under cover of war. The problem was that by the time of the Weimar republic, 65% of German Jews had intermarried